$105 billion worth of US government bonds taken out of the Fed
$105 billion dollars worth of US government bonds out of the Federal Reserve, according to the latest data from the US central bank.
+
A withdrawal of this scale is unprecedented. It’s important to note that just because these assets were pulled from the Fed doesn't mean that they were actually sold.. Liquid though the US bond market is, if someone dumped more than $100 billion of bonds on it, it would cause a pretty good ripple, which likely would have pushed up government bond yields sharply. Nothing like that has happened over the last week.
+
+
So it’s more likely that these Treasurys were just transferred to another, perhaps more neutral, bank. Maybe just for safe-keeping, until all this unpleasantness blows over. Anyway, there’s plenty of speculation along those lines at the moment.
$105 billion worth of US government bonds taken out of the Fed
$105 billion dollars worth of US government bonds out of the Federal Reserve, according to the latest data from the US central bank.
+
+
+
Growth,divisions and QE-G20 2014
The world's rich nations pushed back today against emerging market complaints about the spillover effects of their monetary policies.
As finance ministers and central bank chiefs from the Group of 20 developed and emerging countries gather ahead of a weekend meeting in Sydney, many are already talking at cross purposes.
Emerging nations want the US Federal Reserve to calibrate its winding down of stimulus so as to mitigate the impact on their economies and financial markets.
Developed members reply that the troubles in the emerging world are mostly home grown and domestic interest rates have to be set with domestic recoveries in mind.
A draft of the communique, reported by Bloomberg News, highlighted how the push for growth had trumped concerns about volatility in emerging markets that had threatened to overshadow the meeting.
"We recognise accommodative monetary policy settings in advanced economies will need to normalise in due course, in line with stronger growth," the draft added.
"We recognise accommodative monetary policy settings in advanced economies will need to normalise in due course, in line with stronger growth," the draft added.
Developed market policymakers see little risk of the recent market turmoil spiralling into the kind of contagion which prompted concerted and coordinated action from the G20 following the global financial crisis.
"Emerging markets need to take steps of their own to get their fiscal house in order and put structural reforms in place," US Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said at a financial conference in Sydney ahead of the ministerial meetings.
That was a sentiment very much echoed by the finance ministers of Japan, Britain and Germany.
German's Wolfgang Schaeuble told CNBC that emerging countries first had to do their homework, before demanding solidarity from the rest of the G20.
Japan's Taro Aso said the Fed's tapering of its stimulus programme was positive as it reflected an improving US economy, even if it raised the risk of sharp capital outflows from other countries.
"It is important for emerging economies to correct these things by making their own efforts," Aso said in Tokyo.
Developing nations from South Africa to Turkey to Russia have seen their currencies crumble in recent months as the prospect of higher returns in the US took foreign funds from their economies.
South Korea Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Strategy and Finance Hyun Oh Seok suggested the Fed and other major central banks could at least strive to avoid surprises in their policy.
"QE tapering should be undertaken in a very orderly manner and carefully calibrated given the global economy today is very much interconnected," Hyun told Reuters, referring to quantitative easing, usually in the form of central bank purchases of bonds or other assets.
'Setting a growth target a good idea'
Australian Treasurer Joe Hockey is trying to bring some much-needed focus to the G20, proposing members sign on to ambitious growth agendas, and hold each other to account for delivering them. He is having some early success.
Setting such a growth target was "a good idea", IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde said earlier this week. "There is a potential for doing better and more, if only countries take some action."
He won further support today from Britain's finance minister, George Osborne. "If we could adopt a target, or an aspiration, that would be a good thing," Osborne said in Sydney.
The need for some sort of fresh stimulus was highlighted by a grim report from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development released today.
It warned that sweeping reforms were urgently needed to boost productivity and lower barriers to trade to avoid a new era of slow growth and stubbornly high unemployment.
"Our message to G20 finance ministers today will be unambiguous: go structural. Go structural to achieve a strong and sustainable balance inclusive growth," OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria said.
Yet the idea of setting concrete goals for the G20 has caused nothing but friction in the past, with proposals to target fiscal and current account deficits coming to nothing in the end.
The proposal has already drawn scepticism, with a German government source criticising the idea as a "slightly antiquated form for economic planning".
But a G20 source said there was a growing chance the final communique from this weekend's meeting would indeed include a single goal for growth.
"It's quite likely there will be a target for global growth. None for each country," the source said.
No comments:
Post a Comment